Gender budgeting
The authors of the report surveyed the distribution of home-help service among the various categories of male and female users.
‘We applied a cost perspective — gender-budgeting analysis, as it’s called — to reveal the gender aspects of resource allocation. This is the first time we have studied a municipal activity closely. Previously, we’ve looked at activities in the county council and at the government budget.’
The investigators used 28 randomly chosen personal files from the municipal home-help service. Half of these files represented female and half male clients.
The study showed clear gender patterns. The results tally well with national surveys of elderly care and unpaid care of family members.
Nursing care for women, services for men
Ill-health and frailty are the factors that mainly determine eligibility for the home-help service. Women are in generally worse health and, in terms of hours, get more home-help service than men.
What, then, do women and men get help with? Women received considerably more help with personal care — actions like taking a shower and getting dressed. Men, on the other hand, were given more help with housework, i.e. actual ‘service’: assistance with breakfast, making beds, washing up, preparing meals, laying the table, taking out the rubbish, doing the laundry, shopping, errands, changing the bedclothes, cleaning, dusting and window-cleaning.
This was remarkable, the researchers thought. If women are in inferior health and have extensive help needs when it comes to personal hygiene, then they should also need more assistance with housework. Is it more difficult for the home-help staff to carry out tasks that are traditionally women’s work?
The authors of the report also analysed the distribution of municipal food deliveries. More food was delivered to women, who thus received more mass-produced food than men. Was this one reason why women received less help from the home-help service with housework — cooking, washing-up and shopping — and, by the same token, food of an inferior quality?
Where cohabiting heterosexual men are concerned, the results suggest that they get their meals prepared by their partners to a higher degree.
The report findings also show that it makes a difference whether the home-help service user has a live-in partner or lives alone. Cohabiting men have housework done by their wives to a greater extent. Cohabiting women, instead, have to get help with housework from the home-help service.
Compared with women, men also receive more help from both sons and daughters, especially their daughters.
‘In the category found to be in the worst health, cohabiting women received more help with housework than the single women. This prompts the question: “Who carries out the housework for the most poorly single women?”’
Skewed distribution
Another finding that surprised both the investigators and the municipal department was that decisions on home-help service regarding women were, on average, more short-term and required earlier review than the decisions applying to men.
The conventional gender-role patterns are recognisable from research relating to Sweden as a whole. How, then, are costs distributed between women and men?
‘After we had priced the home-help service hours, it became clear that the women in our data were getting a substantially larger share. Of all the service resources, 64 per cent went to the women and 36 per cent to the men. The women received home-help service for just under SEK 90 000 more a month than the men.’
Home-help service users do not pay the whole of this sum themselves. The charge is calculated on the basis of the individual’s financial situation.